Acquisition & Condominium Sell-Out

8734-8736 Burnet Avenue

20-Unit Townhome Acquisition → Individual Condominium Sell-Out · North Hills, Los Angeles, CA 91343
Prepared for Filip Niculete For-sale / merchant-build underwriting DD update: May 28, 2026 As-Is package: LAAA Model, June 2026 Basis: Fully Executed PSA
8734-8736 Burnet Avenue — 20-unit tri-level townhome complex, North Hills
8734-8736 Burnet Avenue — 20-unit tri-level townhome complex, North Hills, CA 91343

01The Deal

A 20-unit, 1990-built tri-level townhome complex under contract at the seller's counter of $4,100,000 all cash (~$205,000/unit; the MLS list price was $3,950,000). The mix is 12 two-bedroom (1,040 SF) and 8 three-bedroom (1,380–1,530 SF) townhomes, each with an attached 2-car garage; 5 units are currently vacant. The County Assessor records all 20 units as separate condominium parcels (APNs 2654-007-167 to -186), built 1990; per the listing the homeowners' association ("8734 Burnet HOA") went dormant when the seller consolidated all 20 units in 2008. The business plan is a for-sale condominium sell-out: acquire the building at a rental basis (~$205,000/unit), restore the condominium structure, renovate, and sell the 20 units individually at retail condo pricing (~$495K–$680K each). In-place rents carry the property during the sell-out — this is a merchant-build / for-sale play, not a long-term rental hold.

The Plan — in one line

Buy 20 townhomes wholesale at $205K/unit, restore the recorded condominium map, light-renovate, and retail them out one-by-one at ~$430–$476/SF — a ~$10.9M sell-out against a ~$5.5–6.0M all-in basis. The 20-parcel condo subdivision is already recorded at the Assessor, so the path is HOA reactivation, not a ground-up conversion. Detailed in Sections 02–07.

Counter Price
$4,100,000
Units
20
Price / Unit
$205,000
Year Built
1990
Unit Mix
12 · 8 2BR / 3BR
Vacant
5 of 20
Close of Escrow
45 days +15 opt.
Contingency Period
12 days

PSA fully executed; escrow open. All cash, property sold as-is / where-is with no seller repairs, 3% deposit ($123,000). Buyer assumes the City's Report (9A) work after closing. Escrow: Atlantic Escrow (Ruby Tsai); Title: Fidelity Title (Nicole Menard). DD package received May 21, 2026. — Sourced from the Fully Executed PSA (DocuSign envelope 1ED3F854) and seller DD delivery.

02The Plan: Condominium Sell-Out

This is the business plan — buy wholesale, sell retail. The entire return is the spread between the rental-basis acquisition (~$205K/unit) and the for-sale value of a renovated condominium (~$495K for a 2BR, ~$625K for a 3BR). The 20 units are already recorded as separate condominium parcels at the County Assessor (APNs 2654-007-167 to -186), so the path is reviving the dormant 8734 Burnet HOA and selling the units individually — not stabilizing and holding a rental. In-place rents (Section 08) simply carry the property while the units are renovated and sold off. How the spread is captured depends on the legal path: the Assessor and listing indicate the subdivision is already in place — a fast HOA reactivation — but if the title report shows otherwise it becomes a full Tentative-Tract-Map conversion. The model in Section 04 lets you compare both.

Step 1 — Buy

Acquire

Close the 20-unit building all-cash per the counter, funded with an acquisition & renovation loan plus equity.

Step 2 — Restore

Reactivate / Convert

Confirm the recorded 1990 subdivision and revive the dormant 8734 Burnet HOA — or, if no map is on record, file a Tentative Tract Map.

Step 3 — Renovate

Improve

Moderate per-unit refresh (kitchens, baths, finishes). Electrical panels are already replaced — one major item off the list.

Step 4 — Sell

Retail Out

Market and sell 20 individual condominiums, repaying the loan and returning equity plus profit as units close. This is the exit — not a refinance-and-hold.

Why sell, not hold

At a ~$5.5–6.0M all-in basis and a ~$10.9M sell-out, the for-sale exit realizes the condominium premium in ~20 months rather than waiting years for a rental ramp to be capitalized. The recorded subdivision is the unlock — most 20-unit buildings can't be sold off piece-by-piece; this one can.

03For-Sale Comp Analysis

Finished-product evidence: what renovated condominiums trade for in North Hills (91343). The value argument is finished-condo $/SF by unit type — the same $/SF that drives the exit values in the model.

Closed Sales — North Hills Condos (2025)

AddressStatusBD/BASF Price$/SFSold
8601 Burnet Ave #DClosed 2 / 2948$465,000 $491Nov 26, 2025
8958 Burnet Ave #A1Closed 2 / 3$525,000 Nov 5, 2025
9140 Burnet Ave #3Closed 2 / 31,275$512,500 $402Sep 29, 2025
9438 Burnet AveClosed 3 / 2.51,518$679,990 $448Jun 27, 2025
9431 N Sepulveda Blvd #1Closed 3 / 2.51,307$520,000 $398Jun 24, 2025
9834 Sepulveda Blvd #112Closed 2 / 2909$445,000 $490Jun 23, 2025
15108 Plummer St #9Closed 4 / 31,885$692,500 $367Feb 14, 2025

Seven closed condo sales in 91343, 2025. The 2BR comps (8601 Burnet, 9834 Sepulveda) and mid-size 3BR comps (9438 Burnet, 9431 Sepulveda) are the closest profile match to the subject's units.

Active Listings & New-Construction Competition

AddressStatusBD/BASF Price$/SFNotes
8530 Burnet Ave #107Active 3 / 31,284$570,000 $444Direct profile match
9354 Burnet Ave #111Active 3 / 3$724,900 Burnet Ave condo
9800 Sepulveda Blvd #38Active 2 / 21,039$429,500 $4132BR, ~subject SF
Valley Villas — Plan 2/3 (9433 Sepulveda) New Constr. 3 / 2.51,482-1,518$697-705K ~$465-47275-unit project

North Hills median ~$453-463/SF (Feb-Apr 2026). Comp set is preliminary, from public listing aggregators — expand and verify with full MLS closed sales before removing contingencies.

Takeaway 1

Closed 2025 condo sales in 91343 span ~$367-$491/SF; 2BR units cluster ~$445-490/SF and mid-size 3BR units ~$400-450/SF.

Takeaway 2

The model base-cases the exits at $476/SF (2BR) and $432/SF (3BR) — well inside the comp band, conservative against new construction at ~$465-472/SF.

Takeaway 3

Absorption risk is real: Valley Villas is delivering 75 brand-new condos in the same ZIP — direct competition for the 3BR sell-out.

Takeaway 4

Acquisition at $205K/unit vs. a blended finished basis near $547K/unit is the condominium arbitrage — the entire thesis.

04Interactive Sell-Out Return Model

Pick a legal path and a scenario. The $4.1M price, the 12×2BR / 8×3BR mix and the Assessor square footage are Sourced and fixed; exit values are computed as each type's total SF × an editable $/SF. Every other figure is an editable Assumption that recomputes the return live.

Legal Path
Execution Scenario

Acquisition

Unit Mix & Exit Pricing

TypeUnitsTotal SF Reno / unitExit $/SF
2 BR1212,480
3 BR811,580

Restoration & Site Costs

Financing

Sale & Carry

Projected Net Profit
Equity Multiple
Return on Equity
Annualized ROE
Profit Margin
Acquisition price
Acquisition closing costs
Unit renovation (all 20)
Common area / exterior
HOA / map / DRE soft costs
Tenant relocation
City 9A work
Loan fee + interest carry
Property carry
Selling costs
Less: rental income during hold
Total net project cost
Condominium sellout (revenue)

Acq. + Reno Loan
Equity Required

Interest carry is modeled on a declining loan balance as units sell (≈62% average outstanding). "Equity required" is peak equity, simplified. Annualized ROE is total ROE ÷ years; a true IRR requires a unit-by-unit absorption schedule.

05Unit Schedule & Rent Roll

All 20 units are separate condominium parcels at the LA County Assessor — two identical 10-unit buildings, built 1990. Per-unit square footage is from Assessor records; the Est. Exit Value column is each unit's SF × the sell-out model's current exit $/SF — i.e., the retail price each condo is sold for. For in-place vs. market rent and the interim rental carry, see Section 08. The five vacant units (per the certified April 2026 rent roll) are all in the 8736 building — the natural first units to deliver and sell: #1, #2, #3, #4, #6.

#UnitAPNMix SqFtEst. Exit Value
18734 Burnet Ave #12654-007-1673 BR / 3 BA1,530
28734 Burnet Ave #22654-007-1682 BR / 3 BA1,040
38734 Burnet Ave #32654-007-1692 BR / 3 BA1,040
48734 Burnet Ave #42654-007-1702 BR / 3 BA1,040
58734 Burnet Ave #52654-007-1712 BR / 3 BA1,040
68734 Burnet Ave #62654-007-1723 BR / 3 BA1,380
78734 Burnet Ave #72654-007-1733 BR / 3 BA1,380
88734 Burnet Ave #82654-007-1742 BR / 3 BA1,040
98734 Burnet Ave #92654-007-1752 BR / 3 BA1,040
108734 Burnet Ave #102654-007-1763 BR / 3 BA1,500
118736 Burnet Ave #12654-007-1773 BR / 3 BA1,530
128736 Burnet Ave #22654-007-1782 BR / 3 BA1,040
138736 Burnet Ave #32654-007-1792 BR / 3 BA1,040
148736 Burnet Ave #42654-007-1802 BR / 3 BA1,040
158736 Burnet Ave #52654-007-1812 BR / 3 BA1,040
168736 Burnet Ave #62654-007-1823 BR / 3 BA1,380
178736 Burnet Ave #72654-007-1833 BR / 3 BA1,380
188736 Burnet Ave #82654-007-1842 BR / 3 BA1,040
198736 Burnet Ave #92654-007-1852 BR / 3 BA1,040
208736 Burnet Ave #102654-007-1863 BR / 3 BA1,500
Total — 20 units 24,060

Est. Exit Value = each unit's Assessor square footage × the model's current exit $/SF () — it ties exactly to the model sellout. Rent column populates from the seller's certified rent roll.

06Reactivation vs. Full Conversion

Same building, same ~$10.9M sellout — the two legal paths differ only in cost, time, and risk. Reactivating an existing recorded subdivision is far faster and cheaper than a ground-up conversion. Which one applies is settled by the preliminary title report.

Base-Case OutcomeReactivationFull Conversion

Generated live from the model. Tap the path / scenario buttons in section 04 to load any combination into the interactive model.

Bottom Line

The plan is the condominium sell-out (Section 02) — buy the 20 townhomes at a $205K/door rental basis and retail them out as individual condos for a ~$10.9M sell-out. Take the reactivation path: because the 20-parcel subdivision is already recorded, reactivation is materially better than a ground-up conversion — roughly $4.3M profit in ~20 months vs. $3.6M over ~33 months — and it removes the binary conversion-approval risk entirely. The in-place rents (Section 08) are interim carry during the sell-out, and a rental hold is the downside fallback if absorption stalls (a 7.1% going-in cap on basis protects the basis either way). Next step: order the preliminary title report to confirm the recorded condo plan.

07LP Investor Waterfall (condo path)

How the deal's equity and profit are distributed between the LP investors (the equity raise) and the GP / sponsor — return of capital, then a preferred return, then a residual split (the sponsor promote). The three structure inputs are editable; capital and profit flow live from the model — change the path or scenario in section 04 and this updates with it.

%
% / yr
% (GP rest)
Distribution TierAmount To LPTo GP
Tier 1 · Return of Capital
Tier 2 · Preferred Return
Tier 3 · Residual Split (promote)
Total Distributions
LP
GP

Share of total project profit — LP investors vs. GP/sponsor (carried interest / promote).

LP Investors

Capital invested
Total distributions
Net profit
Annualized return
Equity multiple

GP / Sponsor

Co-investment
Total distributions
Net profit (incl. promote)
Annualized return
Equity multiple

Standard structure shown: the preferred return accrues pari passu on all equity (LP and GP co-investment), then residual profit splits with a sponsor promote. Preferred return is simple (non-compounded) over the hold period. Adjust the three inputs to the actual partnership terms. Illustrative only — not an offer of securities.

Escrow Open PSA Executed DD Received 05/21/26 As-Is Model 05/28/26

08Interim Income & Current Operations

This is the income you acquire on day one — the in-place rents that carry the property during the condominium sell-out (Section 02), and the downside fallback if absorption stalls. The full DD package is in hand: certified April 2026 rent roll, 2022-2025 owner income statements, recorded leases, property tax bills, insurance binder, title work, and the LAAA As-Is Model (June 2026). The acquisition basis is $4,100,000 — $205,000/unit, $170/SF. The As-Is package underwrites a 6.33% Current cap (leasing the 5 vacants at potential) and a 10.11% Pro Forma cap at portfolio potential rents — the rental fallback shown lower in this section. The for-sale sell-out is the plan; this is the floor under it.

XLSX Download: Rent Roll & Operating Expenses (As-Is Model) Per-unit current + potential rents · LAAA As-Is operating statement (Current vs Pro Forma) · 2025 actual expense detail · 2022–2025 income history — Excel workbook, 4 tabs Download →

Acquisition & In-Place Snapshot

PSA Price
$4,100,000
Status
Escrow Open
Price / Unit
$205,000
Price / SF
$170
In-Place GRM
12.6x
Pro Forma GRM
6.24x As-Is
Current Cap
6.33% As-Is
Pro Forma Cap
10.11% As-Is

Rent Roll by Type — Current vs Potential Per the LAAA As-Is Model, June 2026

TypeUnitsAvg SF Avg CurrentAvg Potential Lift / UnitMonthly Lift
2 BR / 2.5 BA · conventional10 1,040 $1,966$2,600 +$634 +$6,340
2 BR / 2.5 BA · Section 82 1,040 $2,153$2,600 +$447 +$894
3 BR / 2.5 BA · 1,380-1,530 SF8 1,448 $2,101$2,948 +$847 +$6,775
Portfolio (weighted avg)20 1,203 $2,038$2,739 +$701 +$14,015/mo

As-Is Model rollup. Scheduled gross rents: Current $40,765/mo ($489,180/yr; occupied at in-place + vacants imputed at potential); Potential $54,780/mo ($657,360/yr at full portfolio potential). Against the in-place collected $27,070/mo ($324,840/yr), the gap to portfolio potential is +$27,710/mo, +$332,520/yr (+102%). The for-sale comp set in Section 09 supports higher market rents than the As-Is uses (2BR $3,075, 3BR $3,750 midpoints) — the As-Is therefore underwrites conservatively. All 5 vacancies are in the 8736 building (units 1, 2, 3, 4, 6). Three Section 8 units (8734-4, 8734-8, 8736-8); 8734-4 (Tiani Potts) is delinquent on her $854 tenant portion — eviction recommended in the first 90 days.

Current Rent Roll — Unit Detail April 2026, seller-certified

UnitMixSFTenant Lease StartStatusCurrent Rent PotentialNotes
8734-13BR / 2.5BA1,530 Luz Franco Rodriquez07/25/2015 Active to 7/26 $1,550$2,995
8734-22BR / 2.5BA1,040 Liborio Rangel12/23/2011 Month-to-month $1,495$2,600
8734-32BR / 2.5BA1,040 Jaime + Elizabeth Martinez +208/28/2010 Month-to-month $1,325$2,600 Long tenancy — deepest below-market spread
8734-42BR / 2.5BA 1,040Tiani Potts08/17/2012 Delinquent $2,227$2,600 S8: tenant $854 + S8 $1,373. Not paying tenant portion — evict
8734-52BR / 2.5BA1,040 Juan Argueta Month-to-month $1,550$2,600 Lease dates incomplete on rent roll
8734-63BR / 2.5BA1,380 Flavio + Cynthia Hernandez11/29/2016 Month-to-month $1,875$2,900
8734-73BR / 2.5BA1,380 Paty Montes04/31/2011 Month-to-month $1,795$2,900
8734-82BR / 2.5BA1,040 Lisha + Yvonne Saldivar11/01/2010 S8 $2,078$2,600 S8: tenant $266 + S8 $1,812. Paying
8734-92BR / 2.5BA1,040 Lucia Santos03/16/2008 Month-to-month $1,600$2,600 17-year tenancy — longest at the property
8734-103BR / 2.5BA1,500 Yocasta Corrares02/09/2023 Month-to-month $2,495$2,995 Most recent in-place lease — closest to market
8734 Subtotal — 10 units, 100% occupied $17,990$27,390
8736-13BR / 2.5BA 1,530 Vacant $2,995 Premium 3BR — lease at $3,800
8736-22BR / 2.5BA 1,040 Vacant $2,600 Lease at $3,075
8736-32BR / 2.5BA 1,040 Vacant $2,600 Lease at $3,075
8736-42BR / 2.5BA 1,040 Vacant $2,600 Last S8 (terminated); lease conventional at $3,075
8736-52BR / 2.5BA1,040 (name on rent roll: ????)09/11/2015 Active to 9/26 $2,600$2,295 Closest to market in 2BR set — verify tenant identity
8736-63BR / 2.5BA 1,380 Vacant $2,900 Lease at $3,700
8736-73BR / 2.5BA1,380 Gustavo Perez + Rosario Guzman04/31/2011 Month-to-month $1,650$2,900 3BR steepest below-market
8736-82BR / 2.5BA1,040 Demarcos + Yvonne Saldivar07/01/2010 S8 $1,795$2,600 S8: tenant $266 + S8 $1,812 (per rent-roll note)
8736-92BR / 2.5BA1,040 Emmanuel Luna + Veronica Saavedra Ramirez03/12/2017 Month-to-month $1,795$2,600
8736-103BR / 2.5BA1,500 Fabiola + Maynor Aguilar11/22/2011 Month-to-month $1,545$2,995
8736 Subtotal — 10 units, 5 occupied / 5 vacant $9,080$27,390
Portfolio Total — 20 units, 15 occupied / 5 vacant $27,070$54,780 $324,840 current GSI / $657,360 potential

13 of 15 occupied leases are month-to-month — original terms expired between 2009 and 2017. Only 8734-1 (through 7/26) and 8736-5 (through 9/26) remain on multi-year leases. Bath counts per the certified rent roll (all 2.5BA); Assessor records in the Unit Schedule (Section 05) show 3BA — field verify on inspection. Potential rents per the LAAA As-Is Model: $2,600 for 2BR (1,040 SF), $2,900 for 3BR (1,380 SF), $2,995 for 3BR (1,500-1,530 SF). Security deposits omitted here for space — see the downloadable workbook for the full DD pack. Source: Burnet Apt - Rent Roll 2026.xls (seller, April 2026) + 8734-8736 Burnet As-Is Model.pdf (LAAA, June 2026).

Historical Operating North Hills Wong LLC annual income statements, 2022-2025

20222023 20242025
Gross Rental Income $252,792$272,944 $291,564$269,196
Operating Expenses $134,400$206,361 $178,651$211,227
Net Operating Income $118,392$66,583 $112,913$57,969
Expense Ratio 53%76% 61%78%

The 2023 and 2025 expense spikes are largely non-recurring — 2023 carried $27,695 in electrical upgrades (panels replaced) and $15,251 in repairs; 2025 included $35,806 in repairs and $20,344 in plumbing. Both years coincided with elevated vacancy at the 8736 building (income drift down). Stabilized expense ratio normalizes to ~25-30% on market rents — line-item breakdown below.

2025 Operating Expense Detail Actuals vs. stabilized pro forma

Line Item2025 Actual $/UnitStabilized $/UnitNotes
Taxes & Insurance
Property Taxes $45,176$2,259 $48,175$2,409 Prop 13 reassessment at $4.1M × 1.175% (TRA 8-859)
Insurance (AmTrust) $17,753$888 $22,000$1,100 Policy expires 10/9/25 — shop on renewal
Government Fees / Taxes $1,582$79 $1,800$90 LA City business tax, RSO fee
Legal $700$35 $3,000$150 Higher Y1 from Potts eviction
Utilities
Water & Power (LADWP) $29,982$1,499 $31,000$1,550 Common area + house meters; tenants pay in-unit
Trash / Rubbish $24,746$1,237 $25,500$1,275 LA Sanitation, 20-unit pickup
SoCalGas $199$10 $300$15 Common area only
Phone / Internet $419$21 $500$25 Office line + onsite mgr
Management & Admin
Management Fee $18,894$945 $30,500$1,525 2025: 7% of gross. As-Is: 5% of $638K EGI
Onsite Manager (supplies, auto) $1,080$54 $1,200$60 Continue onsite mgr role
Office / Admin / Travel / Mail $962$48 $2,500$125
Site Services
Gardening / Landscaping $1,400$70 $3,600$180 $300/mo contract on takeover
Pest Control $972$49 $1,500$75 Quarterly contract
Fire Inspection / Maintenance $793$40 $1,200$60 Annual LAFD compliance
Repairs & Maintenance 2025 was abnormally high — normalize on stabilization
General Repairs $35,806$1,790 $22,000$1,100 2025 catch-up; stabilized $1,100/unit/yr
Plumbing $20,344$1,017 $8,000$400 2025 was service-call heavy
Roof $8,490$425 $3,000$150 Likely patch work; major roof in reserves
A/C & HVAC $1,809$90 $3,000$150 20-unit, mid-life equipment
Electrical $119$6 $1,500$75 Panels replaced in 2023
Capital Reserves $5,000$250 Not in seller's books — budget on takeover
Total Operating Expenses $211,227$10,561 $215,275$10,764
Expense Ratio 78% on $269K GSI 34% on $638K EGI Ratio collapses as income ramps to As-Is Pro Forma

Stabilized OpEx essentially matches 2025 actuals in dollar terms — the expense story is not cost-cutting, it's revenue acceleration. The 78% expense ratio compresses to ~34% as income ramps from $269K (2025 depressed occupancy) to $638K EGI (As-Is Pro Forma). R&M normalization carries the bulk of the offset (2025's $56K combined repairs + plumbing was non-recurring catch-up). Source: North Hills Wong LLC Annual Income Statements 2022-2025.xlsx; see Operating Statement below for the As-Is summary (June 2026).

Operating Statement — LAAA As-Is Model Current vs Pro Forma, June 2026 · rental-hold fallback — not the base plan

Fallback case only

The plan is to sell the condos (Section 02), not stabilize and hold. This statement is the LAAA As-Is underwriting and exists to show the floor: even if the for-sale market softened and the units were held as rentals, the same $4.1M basis cap-rates at 6.33% current and 10.11% pro forma. It is the downside, not the strategy.

Line ItemCurrentPro Forma $/Unit$/SF
Income
Gross Scheduled Rent $489,180$657,360 $32,868$27.32
Physical Vacancy (3%) ($14,675)($19,721) ($986)($0.82)
Effective Gross Income $474,505$637,639 $31,882$26.50
Expenses
Real Estate Taxes$51,250 $51,250$2,563$2.13
Insurance$20,000 $20,000$1,000$0.83
Utilities — Water & Power$29,982 $29,982$1,499$1.25
Utilities — Gas$199 $199$10$0.01
Trash Removal$26,400 $26,400$1,320$1.10
Repairs & Maintenance$20,000 $20,000$1,000$0.83
Contract Services$8,000 $8,000$400$0.33
Pest Control$2,000 $2,000$100$0.08
General & Administrative$3,613 $3,613$181$0.15
Onsite$30,000 $30,000$1,500$1.25
Management Fee (5%)$23,725 $31,882$1,594$1.33
Total Operating Expenses $215,169$223,326 $11,166$9.28
Expense Ratio (% of EGI) 45.3%35.0%
Net Operating Income $259,336$414,314 $20,716$17.22
Cap Rate on $4.1M 6.33%10.11%
GRM (Price / GSR) 8.38x6.24x

Mirrors the LAAA As-Is Model dated As of June 2026. Current = leased rents + vacants imputed at potential; Pro Forma = all units at As-Is potential. Building is 1990-vintage — not subject to LA RSO (pre-1978 cutoff); AB 1482 governs rent caps. Source: 8734-8736 Burnet As-Is Model.pdf, Escrows/8734-8736 Burnet Ave/Due Diligence/Burnet As Is/.

Fallback 5-Yr EM
~1.9x
Fallback 5-Yr IRR all-cash
~14%
Pro Forma NOI Growth
1.60x
Y5 Exit @ 6.0% cap
$6.9M

Fallback all-cash IRR assumes acquisition $4.10M + $50K closing + $200K initial turnover & reno on the 5 vacant units, NOI ramp from the As-Is Current ($259K) to the As-Is Pro Forma ($414K) over five years, exit Y5 at 6.0% cap less 4% selling costs. The base plan — the condominium sell-out in Sections 02–07 — targets a higher return over a much shorter (~20-month) hold; these rental figures are the downside reference only.

The plan is to sell

The 20 units are recorded as separate condominium parcels (APNs 167-186) — the subdivision is already in place. Reviving the HOA (Sections 02 + 06) costs ~$160K and unlocks the $10.9M sell-out. Selling the units, not holding them, is the play.

Interim carry

The 15 occupied leases (~$324K/yr in-place GSI) carry property taxes, insurance, and debt service while units are renovated and sold off. Lease the 5 vacants only as needed to support carry — or deliver them vacant to sell first.

Why not just hold

The As-Is rental fallback is a respectable 10.11% pro forma cap on basis — but the for-sale exit realizes the ~$5M condominium premium now instead of via years of rent pushes. The recorded condo map is what makes selling the play.

Downside protection

If the for-sale market softens, the same $4.1M basis cap-rates at 6.33% in Year 1 (As-Is Current, vacants leased at potential) and 10.11% at Pro Forma — both accretive to LA multifamily trades. Sell-out = upside; rental floor protects the basis.

Sourced Fully Executed PSA · April 2026 rent roll (seller-certified) · North Hills Wong LLC annual income statements 2022-2025 · LAAA team rent comp report (8734-8736 Burnet Ave) · LA County Assessor records.

09Rent Comps

The rent comp set was assembled by the LAAA team in May 2026. The closest match is 8958 Burnet Ave — same street, 1989 vintage, townhouse format with 2-car garage. Comp midpoints support 2BR $3,075 / 3BR $3,750. Section 08's interim pro forma is anchored to the more conservative LAAA As-Is Model (June 2026), which underwrites 2BR at $2,600 and 3BR at $2,900–$2,995 — the gap between As-Is potentials and these comp midpoints is upside the rental fallback leaves on the table.

2 Bed / 2.5 Bath ~1,040 SF subject units · 12 of 20

#AddressCityType Bd/BaSFYr Built Mo. RentRent/SF Dist.Notes
18958 Burnet AveNorth Hills Townhouse 2 / 2.5~1,145 1989 $2,950-3,500 $2.58-3.060.2 mi Same street; same era; in-unit W/D, 2-car garage, pool, gated
215951 Bryant StNorth Hills Townhouse 2 / 2.5~1,000 $3,300-3,500 $3.30-3.500.7 mi Smaller footprint; upper end of 91343 2BR range
315441 Nordhoff StNorth Hills Apartment 2 / 2 ↓1,100 $2,295-2,350 ~$2.090.8 mi Gables East; inferior bath (2 vs. 2.5); 91343 floor; pool, gated
411541 Blucher AveGranada Hills Townhouse 2 / 2.51,570-1,759 $3,350-3,695 $1.96-2.104.5 mi Almeria Townhomes; larger units suppress $/SF; quality reference
Indicated Market Rent — 2BR / 2.5BA / ~1,040 SF $2,950-3,200 $2.80-3.08 Anchored by 8958 Burnet (same street, same era)

3 Bed / 2.5 Bath ~1,380-1,530 SF subject units · 8 of 20

#AddressCityType Bd/BaSFYr Built Mo. RentRent/SF Dist.Notes
18435 Burnet AveNorth Hills Townhouse 3 / 2.5~1,357 ~$3,600 ~$2.650.3 mi Tri-level; same street; exact bath config; 2-car garage, pool
215024 Nordhoff StNorth Hills Townhouse 3 / 3 ↑1,288 $3,950+ ~$3.070.9 mi Superior bath count (3 full); in-unit W/D, vaulted ceilings
39400 Burnet AveNorth Hills Townhouse 3 / —~1,996 $3,800+ ~$1.900.7 mi Same street; renovated; W/D, 2-car garage, fitness center
417729 Superior StNorthridge Townhouse 3 / 2.51,559 1997-98 $3,795-4,200 $2.43-2.692.5 mi Countryside at Northridge; best size match; exact bath; gated
511541 Blucher AveGranada Hills Townhouse 3 / 2.5~1,570-1,759 $3,795 $2.16-2.424.5 mi Almeria Townhomes; pool, gym, 2-car garages; GH premium
619535 Nordhoff StNorthridge New Constr. 3 / 2.51,566 Recent $4,087-4,477 $2.61-2.863.5 mi Symmetry (Shea); luxury new constr.; ceiling reference only
Indicated Market Rent — 3BR / 2.5BA / ~1,530 SF $3,600-3,900 $2.35-2.55 Anchored by 8435 Burnet & Countryside at Northridge
Anchor comp — 8958 Burnet

Same street, same era (1989 vs. 1990), same townhouse format with 2-car garage and in-unit laundry. Asking $2,950-$3,500 for 2BR/2.5BA at ~1,145 SF — sets the floor and ceiling on the subject's 2BR.

Townhouse premium

2.5-bath townhouse with private 2-car garage and in-unit W/D commands a 15-35% premium over flat apartments in 91343 (vs. avg 2BD flat at $2,471/mo, 945 SF). The subject is on the premium side of that gap.

Vintage holds up

1990-built is competitive with the comp set — 8958 Burnet (1989) and Countryside at Northridge (1997-98) anchor the indicated range. Subject is not disadvantaged on vintage relative to most comps.

Underwriting discipline

North Hills rents declined ~1.26% YoY in early 2026 (RentCafe) — softening market. The pro forma uses the midpoint of each indicated range ($3,075 / $3,750), not the high end. Symmetry's $4,087-4,477 luxury ceiling is excluded entirely.

Sourced LAAA team rent comp report — 8734-8736 Burnet Ave Rent Comps.html, May 2026. Market context: RentCafe, ApartmentList. All comps independently verified against active listings on Apartments.com, Zillow, and CoStar.

10Key Risks & Contingencies

These items drive the spread between the cases — and the first one is the master variable.

1. The legal path — evidence favors reactivation

The LA County Assessor records all 20 units as separate "Condominium" parcels (APNs 2654-007-167 to -186), so a condominium subdivision is on record — this points to a reactivation, not a ground-up conversion. The remaining work is reviving the dormant 8734 Burnet HOA and confirming the CC&Rs are current. The preliminary title report should still confirm the recorded condo plan and a clean path; full-conversion cost and timing (Tentative Tract Map, ~12-24 month entitlement, the ≥5% area-vacancy gate under LAMC 12.95.2) are retained only as the downside case.

2. City 9A required work — scope unknown

The counter makes the buyer responsible for the work in the City's Report (9A) after closing. The model carries a $150K placeholder. The actual scope must be obtained and priced in the 12-day contingency window — it could be materially higher.

3. Tenant relocation & occupancy

15 of the 20 units are occupied (5 vacant). Delivering units for individual sale requires tenant turnover with proper notice and relocation assistance. The 1990 build is non-RSO, which eases this, but LA's non-RSO relocation rules still apply — verify amounts and tenant categories with counsel against the rent roll.

4. Absorption against new supply

Valley Villas is delivering 75 new-construction condos in the same ZIP. Selling 20 units into that competition may require price concessions or a longer sell-through — both modeled via the exit-value and timeline inputs.

5. The contingency window

PSA fully executed; 12 calendar days from acceptance to remove contingencies, with the 3% deposit ($123,000) at risk after that. Title work and the 9A scope must be priced and confirmed inside that window. DD package was delivered on May 21, 2026 — rent roll, P&Ls, leases, taxes, and insurance are in hand and validate the rental thesis.

11Sell-Out Execution & Action Items

Execution priorities for the condominium sell-out — sequenced from the contingency window through unit closings:

  • Order the preliminary title report immediately — confirm the recorded condominium plan / subdivision map (APNs 167-186) and CC&Rs. This settles the master variable: HOA reactivation (the plan) vs. a full Tentative-Tract-Map conversion.
  • Confirm / revive the 8734 Burnet HOA (CA Secretary of State / FTB) — reinstate the dormant association, update CC&Rs, and budget the ~$160K reactivation cost; engage condo/HOA counsel and a DRE consultant on the public report path.
  • Price the renovation & common-area scope with a GC — per-unit refresh (kitchens, baths, finishes) plus exterior/common area; electrical panels are already replaced. Lock the budget that drives the model's exit $/SF.
  • Obtain the City's Report (9A) and price the required work — placeholder $150K; scope must be confirmed in the 12-day contingency window before the deposit goes hard.
  • Build the unit-by-unit sell-out / absorption schedule — sequence which units deliver vacant first (the 5 existing vacancies in 8736 lead); set release pricing against the for-sale comps (Section 03) and stage releases against Valley Villas' 75-unit competition.
  • Plan tenant delivery — for occupied units, schedule turnover with proper notice and non-RSO relocation; prioritize the deepest below-market / long-tenancy units. Initiate the 8734-4 (Tiani Potts) S8 delinquency / eviction with LAHD.
  • Run the interim rental as carry, not as a hold — keep occupied units paying to cover taxes/insurance/debt service during the sell-out; only re-lease vacants if a unit isn't being readied for sale.
  • Engage a sell-out listing/marketing program (individual condo MLS listings, lender pre-approval relationships); line up construction-to-sale financing draw/release mechanics tied to unit closings.
  • Loss-runs & insurance — binder $17,752 (AmTrust, expires 10/09/25); place a builder's-risk / renovation policy for the sell-out period.