A 20-unit, 1990-built tri-level townhome complex under contract at the seller's counter of $4,100,000 all cash (~$205,000/unit; the MLS list price was $3,950,000). The mix is 12 two-bedroom (1,040 SF) and 8 three-bedroom (1,380–1,530 SF) townhomes, each with an attached 2-car garage; 5 units are currently vacant. The County Assessor records all 20 units as separate condominium parcels (APNs 2654-007-167 to -186), built 1990; per the listing the homeowners' association ("8734 Burnet HOA") went dormant when the seller consolidated all 20 units in 2008. The business plan is a for-sale condominium sell-out: acquire the building at a rental basis (~$205,000/unit), restore the condominium structure, renovate, and sell the 20 units individually at retail condo pricing (~$495K–$680K each). In-place rents carry the property during the sell-out — this is a merchant-build / for-sale play, not a long-term rental hold.
Buy 20 townhomes wholesale at $205K/unit, restore the recorded condominium map, light-renovate, and retail them out one-by-one at ~$430–$476/SF — a ~$10.9M sell-out against a ~$5.5–6.0M all-in basis. The 20-parcel condo subdivision is already recorded at the Assessor, so the path is HOA reactivation, not a ground-up conversion. Detailed in Sections 02–07.
PSA fully executed; escrow open. All cash, property sold as-is / where-is with no seller repairs, 3% deposit ($123,000). Buyer assumes the City's Report (9A) work after closing. Escrow: Atlantic Escrow (Ruby Tsai); Title: Fidelity Title (Nicole Menard). DD package received May 21, 2026. — Sourced from the Fully Executed PSA (DocuSign envelope 1ED3F854) and seller DD delivery.
This is the business plan — buy wholesale, sell retail. The entire return is the spread between the rental-basis acquisition (~$205K/unit) and the for-sale value of a renovated condominium (~$495K for a 2BR, ~$625K for a 3BR). The 20 units are already recorded as separate condominium parcels at the County Assessor (APNs 2654-007-167 to -186), so the path is reviving the dormant 8734 Burnet HOA and selling the units individually — not stabilizing and holding a rental. In-place rents (Section 08) simply carry the property while the units are renovated and sold off. How the spread is captured depends on the legal path: the Assessor and listing indicate the subdivision is already in place — a fast HOA reactivation — but if the title report shows otherwise it becomes a full Tentative-Tract-Map conversion. The model in Section 04 lets you compare both.
Close the 20-unit building all-cash per the counter, funded with an acquisition & renovation loan plus equity.
Confirm the recorded 1990 subdivision and revive the dormant 8734 Burnet HOA — or, if no map is on record, file a Tentative Tract Map.
Moderate per-unit refresh (kitchens, baths, finishes). Electrical panels are already replaced — one major item off the list.
Market and sell 20 individual condominiums, repaying the loan and returning equity plus profit as units close. This is the exit — not a refinance-and-hold.
At a ~$5.5–6.0M all-in basis and a ~$10.9M sell-out, the for-sale exit realizes the condominium premium in ~20 months rather than waiting years for a rental ramp to be capitalized. The recorded subdivision is the unlock — most 20-unit buildings can't be sold off piece-by-piece; this one can.
Finished-product evidence: what renovated condominiums trade for in North Hills (91343). The value argument is finished-condo $/SF by unit type — the same $/SF that drives the exit values in the model.
| Address | Status | BD/BA | SF | Price | $/SF | Sold |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8601 Burnet Ave #D | Closed | 2 / 2 | 948 | $465,000 | $491 | Nov 26, 2025 |
| 8958 Burnet Ave #A1 | Closed | 2 / 3 | — | $525,000 | — | Nov 5, 2025 |
| 9140 Burnet Ave #3 | Closed | 2 / 3 | 1,275 | $512,500 | $402 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| 9438 Burnet Ave | Closed | 3 / 2.5 | 1,518 | $679,990 | $448 | Jun 27, 2025 |
| 9431 N Sepulveda Blvd #1 | Closed | 3 / 2.5 | 1,307 | $520,000 | $398 | Jun 24, 2025 |
| 9834 Sepulveda Blvd #112 | Closed | 2 / 2 | 909 | $445,000 | $490 | Jun 23, 2025 |
| 15108 Plummer St #9 | Closed | 4 / 3 | 1,885 | $692,500 | $367 | Feb 14, 2025 |
Seven closed condo sales in 91343, 2025. The 2BR comps (8601 Burnet, 9834 Sepulveda) and mid-size 3BR comps (9438 Burnet, 9431 Sepulveda) are the closest profile match to the subject's units.
| Address | Status | BD/BA | SF | Price | $/SF | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8530 Burnet Ave #107 | Active | 3 / 3 | 1,284 | $570,000 | $444 | Direct profile match |
| 9354 Burnet Ave #111 | Active | 3 / 3 | — | $724,900 | — | Burnet Ave condo |
| 9800 Sepulveda Blvd #38 | Active | 2 / 2 | 1,039 | $429,500 | $413 | 2BR, ~subject SF |
| Valley Villas — Plan 2/3 (9433 Sepulveda) | New Constr. | 3 / 2.5 | 1,482-1,518 | $697-705K | ~$465-472 | 75-unit project |
North Hills median ~$453-463/SF (Feb-Apr 2026). Comp set is preliminary, from public listing aggregators — expand and verify with full MLS closed sales before removing contingencies.
Closed 2025 condo sales in 91343 span ~$367-$491/SF; 2BR units cluster ~$445-490/SF and mid-size 3BR units ~$400-450/SF.
The model base-cases the exits at $476/SF (2BR) and $432/SF (3BR) — well inside the comp band, conservative against new construction at ~$465-472/SF.
Absorption risk is real: Valley Villas is delivering 75 brand-new condos in the same ZIP — direct competition for the 3BR sell-out.
Acquisition at $205K/unit vs. a blended finished basis near $547K/unit is the condominium arbitrage — the entire thesis.
Pick a legal path and a scenario. The $4.1M price, the 12×2BR / 8×3BR mix and the Assessor square footage are Sourced and fixed; exit values are computed as each type's total SF × an editable $/SF. Every other figure is an editable Assumption that recomputes the return live.
| Type | Units | Total SF | Reno / unit | Exit $/SF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BR | 12 | 12,480 | ||
| 3 BR | 8 | 11,580 |
—
Interest carry is modeled on a declining loan balance as units sell (≈62% average outstanding). "Equity required" is peak equity, simplified. Annualized ROE is total ROE ÷ years; a true IRR requires a unit-by-unit absorption schedule.
All 20 units are separate condominium parcels at the LA County Assessor — two identical 10-unit buildings, built 1990. Per-unit square footage is from Assessor records; the Est. Exit Value column is each unit's SF × the sell-out model's current exit $/SF — i.e., the retail price each condo is sold for. For in-place vs. market rent and the interim rental carry, see Section 08. The five vacant units (per the certified April 2026 rent roll) are all in the 8736 building — the natural first units to deliver and sell: #1, #2, #3, #4, #6.
| # | Unit | APN | Mix | SqFt | Est. Exit Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8734 Burnet Ave #1 | 2654-007-167 | 3 BR / 3 BA | 1,530 | — |
| 2 | 8734 Burnet Ave #2 | 2654-007-168 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 3 | 8734 Burnet Ave #3 | 2654-007-169 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 4 | 8734 Burnet Ave #4 | 2654-007-170 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 5 | 8734 Burnet Ave #5 | 2654-007-171 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 6 | 8734 Burnet Ave #6 | 2654-007-172 | 3 BR / 3 BA | 1,380 | — |
| 7 | 8734 Burnet Ave #7 | 2654-007-173 | 3 BR / 3 BA | 1,380 | — |
| 8 | 8734 Burnet Ave #8 | 2654-007-174 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 9 | 8734 Burnet Ave #9 | 2654-007-175 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 10 | 8734 Burnet Ave #10 | 2654-007-176 | 3 BR / 3 BA | 1,500 | — |
| 11 | 8736 Burnet Ave #1 | 2654-007-177 | 3 BR / 3 BA | 1,530 | — |
| 12 | 8736 Burnet Ave #2 | 2654-007-178 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 13 | 8736 Burnet Ave #3 | 2654-007-179 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 14 | 8736 Burnet Ave #4 | 2654-007-180 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 15 | 8736 Burnet Ave #5 | 2654-007-181 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 16 | 8736 Burnet Ave #6 | 2654-007-182 | 3 BR / 3 BA | 1,380 | — |
| 17 | 8736 Burnet Ave #7 | 2654-007-183 | 3 BR / 3 BA | 1,380 | — |
| 18 | 8736 Burnet Ave #8 | 2654-007-184 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 19 | 8736 Burnet Ave #9 | 2654-007-185 | 2 BR / 3 BA | 1,040 | — |
| 20 | 8736 Burnet Ave #10 | 2654-007-186 | 3 BR / 3 BA | 1,500 | — |
| Total — 20 units | 24,060 | — | |||
Est. Exit Value = each unit's Assessor square footage × the model's current exit $/SF (—) — it ties exactly to the model sellout. Rent column populates from the seller's certified rent roll.
Same building, same ~$10.9M sellout — the two legal paths differ only in cost, time, and risk. Reactivating an existing recorded subdivision is far faster and cheaper than a ground-up conversion. Which one applies is settled by the preliminary title report.
| Base-Case Outcome | Reactivation | Full Conversion |
|---|
Generated live from the model. Tap the path / scenario buttons in section 04 to load any combination into the interactive model.
The plan is the condominium sell-out (Section 02) — buy the 20 townhomes at a $205K/door rental basis and retail them out as individual condos for a ~$10.9M sell-out. Take the reactivation path: because the 20-parcel subdivision is already recorded, reactivation is materially better than a ground-up conversion — roughly $4.3M profit in ~20 months vs. $3.6M over ~33 months — and it removes the binary conversion-approval risk entirely. The in-place rents (Section 08) are interim carry during the sell-out, and a rental hold is the downside fallback if absorption stalls (a 7.1% going-in cap on basis protects the basis either way). Next step: order the preliminary title report to confirm the recorded condo plan.
How the deal's equity and profit are distributed between the LP investors (the equity raise) and the GP / sponsor — return of capital, then a preferred return, then a residual split (the sponsor promote). The three structure inputs are editable; capital and profit flow live from the model — change the path or scenario in section 04 and this updates with it.
| Distribution Tier | Amount | To LP | To GP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 · Return of Capital | — | — | — |
| Tier 2 · Preferred Return | — | — | — |
| Tier 3 · Residual Split (promote) | — | — | — |
| Total Distributions | — | — | — |
Share of total project profit — LP investors vs. GP/sponsor (carried interest / promote).
Standard structure shown: the preferred return accrues pari passu on all equity (LP and GP co-investment), then residual profit splits with a sponsor promote. Preferred return is simple (non-compounded) over the hold period. Adjust the three inputs to the actual partnership terms. Illustrative only — not an offer of securities.
This is the income you acquire on day one — the in-place rents that carry the property during the condominium sell-out (Section 02), and the downside fallback if absorption stalls. The full DD package is in hand: certified April 2026 rent roll, 2022-2025 owner income statements, recorded leases, property tax bills, insurance binder, title work, and the LAAA As-Is Model (June 2026). The acquisition basis is $4,100,000 — $205,000/unit, $170/SF. The As-Is package underwrites a 6.33% Current cap (leasing the 5 vacants at potential) and a 10.11% Pro Forma cap at portfolio potential rents — the rental fallback shown lower in this section. The for-sale sell-out is the plan; this is the floor under it.
XLSX Download: Rent Roll & Operating Expenses (As-Is Model) Per-unit current + potential rents · LAAA As-Is operating statement (Current vs Pro Forma) · 2025 actual expense detail · 2022–2025 income history — Excel workbook, 4 tabs Download →| Type | Units | Avg SF | Avg Current | Avg Potential | Lift / Unit | Monthly Lift |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BR / 2.5 BA · conventional | 10 | 1,040 | $1,966 | $2,600 | +$634 | +$6,340 |
| 2 BR / 2.5 BA · Section 8 | 2 | 1,040 | $2,153 | $2,600 | +$447 | +$894 |
| 3 BR / 2.5 BA · 1,380-1,530 SF | 8 | 1,448 | $2,101 | $2,948 | +$847 | +$6,775 |
| Portfolio (weighted avg) | 20 | 1,203 | $2,038 | $2,739 | +$701 | +$14,015/mo |
As-Is Model rollup. Scheduled gross rents: Current $40,765/mo ($489,180/yr; occupied at in-place + vacants imputed at potential); Potential $54,780/mo ($657,360/yr at full portfolio potential). Against the in-place collected $27,070/mo ($324,840/yr), the gap to portfolio potential is +$27,710/mo, +$332,520/yr (+102%). The for-sale comp set in Section 09 supports higher market rents than the As-Is uses (2BR $3,075, 3BR $3,750 midpoints) — the As-Is therefore underwrites conservatively. All 5 vacancies are in the 8736 building (units 1, 2, 3, 4, 6). Three Section 8 units (8734-4, 8734-8, 8736-8); 8734-4 (Tiani Potts) is delinquent on her $854 tenant portion — eviction recommended in the first 90 days.
| Unit | Mix | SF | Tenant | Lease Start | Status | Current Rent | Potential | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8734-1 | 3BR / 2.5BA | 1,530 | Luz Franco Rodriquez | 07/25/2015 | Active to 7/26 | $1,550 | $2,995 | — |
| 8734-2 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | Liborio Rangel | 12/23/2011 | Month-to-month | $1,495 | $2,600 | — |
| 8734-3 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | Jaime + Elizabeth Martinez +2 | 08/28/2010 | Month-to-month | $1,325 | $2,600 | Long tenancy — deepest below-market spread |
| 8734-4 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | Tiani Potts | 08/17/2012 | Delinquent | $2,227 | $2,600 | S8: tenant $854 + S8 $1,373. Not paying tenant portion — evict |
| 8734-5 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | Juan Argueta | — | Month-to-month | $1,550 | $2,600 | Lease dates incomplete on rent roll |
| 8734-6 | 3BR / 2.5BA | 1,380 | Flavio + Cynthia Hernandez | 11/29/2016 | Month-to-month | $1,875 | $2,900 | — |
| 8734-7 | 3BR / 2.5BA | 1,380 | Paty Montes | 04/31/2011 | Month-to-month | $1,795 | $2,900 | — |
| 8734-8 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | Lisha + Yvonne Saldivar | 11/01/2010 | S8 | $2,078 | $2,600 | S8: tenant $266 + S8 $1,812. Paying |
| 8734-9 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | Lucia Santos | 03/16/2008 | Month-to-month | $1,600 | $2,600 | 17-year tenancy — longest at the property |
| 8734-10 | 3BR / 2.5BA | 1,500 | Yocasta Corrares | 02/09/2023 | Month-to-month | $2,495 | $2,995 | Most recent in-place lease — closest to market |
| 8734 Subtotal — 10 units, 100% occupied | $17,990 | $27,390 | — | |||||
| 8736-1 | 3BR / 2.5BA | 1,530 | — | — | Vacant | — | $2,995 | Premium 3BR — lease at $3,800 |
| 8736-2 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | — | — | Vacant | — | $2,600 | Lease at $3,075 |
| 8736-3 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | — | — | Vacant | — | $2,600 | Lease at $3,075 |
| 8736-4 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | — | — | Vacant | — | $2,600 | Last S8 (terminated); lease conventional at $3,075 |
| 8736-5 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | (name on rent roll: ????) | 09/11/2015 | Active to 9/26 | $2,600 | $2,295 | Closest to market in 2BR set — verify tenant identity |
| 8736-6 | 3BR / 2.5BA | 1,380 | — | — | Vacant | — | $2,900 | Lease at $3,700 |
| 8736-7 | 3BR / 2.5BA | 1,380 | Gustavo Perez + Rosario Guzman | 04/31/2011 | Month-to-month | $1,650 | $2,900 | 3BR steepest below-market |
| 8736-8 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | Demarcos + Yvonne Saldivar | 07/01/2010 | S8 | $1,795 | $2,600 | S8: tenant $266 + S8 $1,812 (per rent-roll note) |
| 8736-9 | 2BR / 2.5BA | 1,040 | Emmanuel Luna + Veronica Saavedra Ramirez | 03/12/2017 | Month-to-month | $1,795 | $2,600 | — |
| 8736-10 | 3BR / 2.5BA | 1,500 | Fabiola + Maynor Aguilar | 11/22/2011 | Month-to-month | $1,545 | $2,995 | — |
| 8736 Subtotal — 10 units, 5 occupied / 5 vacant | $9,080 | $27,390 | — | |||||
| Portfolio Total — 20 units, 15 occupied / 5 vacant | $27,070 | $54,780 | $324,840 current GSI / $657,360 potential | |||||
13 of 15 occupied leases are month-to-month — original terms expired between 2009 and 2017. Only 8734-1 (through 7/26) and 8736-5 (through 9/26) remain on multi-year leases. Bath counts per the certified rent roll (all 2.5BA); Assessor records in the Unit Schedule (Section 05) show 3BA — field verify on inspection. Potential rents per the LAAA As-Is Model: $2,600 for 2BR (1,040 SF), $2,900 for 3BR (1,380 SF), $2,995 for 3BR (1,500-1,530 SF). Security deposits omitted here for space — see the downloadable workbook for the full DD pack. Source: Burnet Apt - Rent Roll 2026.xls (seller, April 2026) + 8734-8736 Burnet As-Is Model.pdf (LAAA, June 2026).
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Rental Income | $252,792 | $272,944 | $291,564 | $269,196 |
| Operating Expenses | $134,400 | $206,361 | $178,651 | $211,227 |
| Net Operating Income | $118,392 | $66,583 | $112,913 | $57,969 |
| Expense Ratio | 53% | 76% | 61% | 78% |
The 2023 and 2025 expense spikes are largely non-recurring — 2023 carried $27,695 in electrical upgrades (panels replaced) and $15,251 in repairs; 2025 included $35,806 in repairs and $20,344 in plumbing. Both years coincided with elevated vacancy at the 8736 building (income drift down). Stabilized expense ratio normalizes to ~25-30% on market rents — line-item breakdown below.
| Line Item | 2025 Actual | $/Unit | Stabilized | $/Unit | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxes & Insurance | |||||
| Property Taxes | $45,176 | $2,259 | $48,175 | $2,409 | Prop 13 reassessment at $4.1M × 1.175% (TRA 8-859) |
| Insurance (AmTrust) | $17,753 | $888 | $22,000 | $1,100 | Policy expires 10/9/25 — shop on renewal |
| Government Fees / Taxes | $1,582 | $79 | $1,800 | $90 | LA City business tax, RSO fee |
| Legal | $700 | $35 | $3,000 | $150 | Higher Y1 from Potts eviction |
| Utilities | |||||
| Water & Power (LADWP) | $29,982 | $1,499 | $31,000 | $1,550 | Common area + house meters; tenants pay in-unit |
| Trash / Rubbish | $24,746 | $1,237 | $25,500 | $1,275 | LA Sanitation, 20-unit pickup |
| SoCalGas | $199 | $10 | $300 | $15 | Common area only |
| Phone / Internet | $419 | $21 | $500 | $25 | Office line + onsite mgr |
| Management & Admin | |||||
| Management Fee | $18,894 | $945 | $30,500 | $1,525 | 2025: 7% of gross. As-Is: 5% of $638K EGI |
| Onsite Manager (supplies, auto) | $1,080 | $54 | $1,200 | $60 | Continue onsite mgr role |
| Office / Admin / Travel / Mail | $962 | $48 | $2,500 | $125 | — |
| Site Services | |||||
| Gardening / Landscaping | $1,400 | $70 | $3,600 | $180 | $300/mo contract on takeover |
| Pest Control | $972 | $49 | $1,500 | $75 | Quarterly contract |
| Fire Inspection / Maintenance | $793 | $40 | $1,200 | $60 | Annual LAFD compliance |
| Repairs & Maintenance 2025 was abnormally high — normalize on stabilization | |||||
| General Repairs | $35,806 | $1,790 | $22,000 | $1,100 | 2025 catch-up; stabilized $1,100/unit/yr |
| Plumbing | $20,344 | $1,017 | $8,000 | $400 | 2025 was service-call heavy |
| Roof | $8,490 | $425 | $3,000 | $150 | Likely patch work; major roof in reserves |
| A/C & HVAC | $1,809 | $90 | $3,000 | $150 | 20-unit, mid-life equipment |
| Electrical | $119 | $6 | $1,500 | $75 | Panels replaced in 2023 |
| Capital Reserves | — | — | $5,000 | $250 | Not in seller's books — budget on takeover |
| Total Operating Expenses | $211,227 | $10,561 | $215,275 | $10,764 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 78% on $269K GSI | — | 34% on $638K EGI | — | Ratio collapses as income ramps to As-Is Pro Forma |
Stabilized OpEx essentially matches 2025 actuals in dollar terms — the expense story is not cost-cutting, it's revenue acceleration. The 78% expense ratio compresses to ~34% as income ramps from $269K (2025 depressed occupancy) to $638K EGI (As-Is Pro Forma). R&M normalization carries the bulk of the offset (2025's $56K combined repairs + plumbing was non-recurring catch-up). Source: North Hills Wong LLC Annual Income Statements 2022-2025.xlsx; see Operating Statement below for the As-Is summary (June 2026).
The plan is to sell the condos (Section 02), not stabilize and hold. This statement is the LAAA As-Is underwriting and exists to show the floor: even if the for-sale market softened and the units were held as rentals, the same $4.1M basis cap-rates at 6.33% current and 10.11% pro forma. It is the downside, not the strategy.
| Line Item | Current | Pro Forma | $/Unit | $/SF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income | ||||
| Gross Scheduled Rent | $489,180 | $657,360 | $32,868 | $27.32 |
| Physical Vacancy (3%) | ($14,675) | ($19,721) | ($986) | ($0.82) |
| Effective Gross Income | $474,505 | $637,639 | $31,882 | $26.50 |
| Expenses | ||||
| Real Estate Taxes | $51,250 | $51,250 | $2,563 | $2.13 |
| Insurance | $20,000 | $20,000 | $1,000 | $0.83 |
| Utilities — Water & Power | $29,982 | $29,982 | $1,499 | $1.25 |
| Utilities — Gas | $199 | $199 | $10 | $0.01 |
| Trash Removal | $26,400 | $26,400 | $1,320 | $1.10 |
| Repairs & Maintenance | $20,000 | $20,000 | $1,000 | $0.83 |
| Contract Services | $8,000 | $8,000 | $400 | $0.33 |
| Pest Control | $2,000 | $2,000 | $100 | $0.08 |
| General & Administrative | $3,613 | $3,613 | $181 | $0.15 |
| Onsite | $30,000 | $30,000 | $1,500 | $1.25 |
| Management Fee (5%) | $23,725 | $31,882 | $1,594 | $1.33 |
| Total Operating Expenses | $215,169 | $223,326 | $11,166 | $9.28 |
| Expense Ratio (% of EGI) | 45.3% | 35.0% | — | — |
| Net Operating Income | $259,336 | $414,314 | $20,716 | $17.22 |
| Cap Rate on $4.1M | 6.33% | 10.11% | — | — |
| GRM (Price / GSR) | 8.38x | 6.24x | — | — |
Mirrors the LAAA As-Is Model dated As of June 2026. Current = leased rents + vacants imputed at potential; Pro Forma = all units at As-Is potential. Building is 1990-vintage — not subject to LA RSO (pre-1978 cutoff); AB 1482 governs rent caps. Source: 8734-8736 Burnet As-Is Model.pdf, Escrows/8734-8736 Burnet Ave/Due Diligence/Burnet As Is/.
Fallback all-cash IRR assumes acquisition $4.10M + $50K closing + $200K initial turnover & reno on the 5 vacant units, NOI ramp from the As-Is Current ($259K) to the As-Is Pro Forma ($414K) over five years, exit Y5 at 6.0% cap less 4% selling costs. The base plan — the condominium sell-out in Sections 02–07 — targets a higher return over a much shorter (~20-month) hold; these rental figures are the downside reference only.
The 20 units are recorded as separate condominium parcels (APNs 167-186) — the subdivision is already in place. Reviving the HOA (Sections 02 + 06) costs ~$160K and unlocks the $10.9M sell-out. Selling the units, not holding them, is the play.
The 15 occupied leases (~$324K/yr in-place GSI) carry property taxes, insurance, and debt service while units are renovated and sold off. Lease the 5 vacants only as needed to support carry — or deliver them vacant to sell first.
The As-Is rental fallback is a respectable 10.11% pro forma cap on basis — but the for-sale exit realizes the ~$5M condominium premium now instead of via years of rent pushes. The recorded condo map is what makes selling the play.
If the for-sale market softens, the same $4.1M basis cap-rates at 6.33% in Year 1 (As-Is Current, vacants leased at potential) and 10.11% at Pro Forma — both accretive to LA multifamily trades. Sell-out = upside; rental floor protects the basis.
Sourced Fully Executed PSA · April 2026 rent roll (seller-certified) · North Hills Wong LLC annual income statements 2022-2025 · LAAA team rent comp report (8734-8736 Burnet Ave) · LA County Assessor records.
The rent comp set was assembled by the LAAA team in May 2026. The closest match is 8958 Burnet Ave — same street, 1989 vintage, townhouse format with 2-car garage. Comp midpoints support 2BR $3,075 / 3BR $3,750. Section 08's interim pro forma is anchored to the more conservative LAAA As-Is Model (June 2026), which underwrites 2BR at $2,600 and 3BR at $2,900–$2,995 — the gap between As-Is potentials and these comp midpoints is upside the rental fallback leaves on the table.
| # | Address | City | Type | Bd/Ba | SF | Yr Built | Mo. Rent | Rent/SF | Dist. | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8958 Burnet Ave | North Hills | Townhouse | 2 / 2.5 | ~1,145 | 1989 | $2,950-3,500 | $2.58-3.06 | 0.2 mi | Same street; same era; in-unit W/D, 2-car garage, pool, gated |
| 2 | 15951 Bryant St | North Hills | Townhouse | 2 / 2.5 | ~1,000 | — | $3,300-3,500 | $3.30-3.50 | 0.7 mi | Smaller footprint; upper end of 91343 2BR range |
| 3 | 15441 Nordhoff St | North Hills | Apartment | 2 / 2 ↓ | 1,100 | — | $2,295-2,350 | ~$2.09 | 0.8 mi | Gables East; inferior bath (2 vs. 2.5); 91343 floor; pool, gated |
| 4 | 11541 Blucher Ave | Granada Hills | Townhouse | 2 / 2.5 | 1,570-1,759 | — | $3,350-3,695 | $1.96-2.10 | 4.5 mi | Almeria Townhomes; larger units suppress $/SF; quality reference |
| Indicated Market Rent — 2BR / 2.5BA / ~1,040 SF | $2,950-3,200 | $2.80-3.08 | Anchored by 8958 Burnet (same street, same era) | |||||||
| # | Address | City | Type | Bd/Ba | SF | Yr Built | Mo. Rent | Rent/SF | Dist. | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8435 Burnet Ave | North Hills | Townhouse | 3 / 2.5 | ~1,357 | — | ~$3,600 | ~$2.65 | 0.3 mi | Tri-level; same street; exact bath config; 2-car garage, pool |
| 2 | 15024 Nordhoff St | North Hills | Townhouse | 3 / 3 ↑ | 1,288 | — | $3,950+ | ~$3.07 | 0.9 mi | Superior bath count (3 full); in-unit W/D, vaulted ceilings |
| 3 | 9400 Burnet Ave | North Hills | Townhouse | 3 / — | ~1,996 | — | $3,800+ | ~$1.90 | 0.7 mi | Same street; renovated; W/D, 2-car garage, fitness center |
| 4 | 17729 Superior St | Northridge | Townhouse | 3 / 2.5 | 1,559 | 1997-98 | $3,795-4,200 | $2.43-2.69 | 2.5 mi | Countryside at Northridge; best size match; exact bath; gated |
| 5 | 11541 Blucher Ave | Granada Hills | Townhouse | 3 / 2.5 | ~1,570-1,759 | — | $3,795 | $2.16-2.42 | 4.5 mi | Almeria Townhomes; pool, gym, 2-car garages; GH premium |
| 6 | 19535 Nordhoff St | Northridge | New Constr. | 3 / 2.5 | 1,566 | Recent | $4,087-4,477 | $2.61-2.86 | 3.5 mi | Symmetry (Shea); luxury new constr.; ceiling reference only |
| Indicated Market Rent — 3BR / 2.5BA / ~1,530 SF | $3,600-3,900 | $2.35-2.55 | Anchored by 8435 Burnet & Countryside at Northridge | |||||||
Same street, same era (1989 vs. 1990), same townhouse format with 2-car garage and in-unit laundry. Asking $2,950-$3,500 for 2BR/2.5BA at ~1,145 SF — sets the floor and ceiling on the subject's 2BR.
2.5-bath townhouse with private 2-car garage and in-unit W/D commands a 15-35% premium over flat apartments in 91343 (vs. avg 2BD flat at $2,471/mo, 945 SF). The subject is on the premium side of that gap.
1990-built is competitive with the comp set — 8958 Burnet (1989) and Countryside at Northridge (1997-98) anchor the indicated range. Subject is not disadvantaged on vintage relative to most comps.
North Hills rents declined ~1.26% YoY in early 2026 (RentCafe) — softening market. The pro forma uses the midpoint of each indicated range ($3,075 / $3,750), not the high end. Symmetry's $4,087-4,477 luxury ceiling is excluded entirely.
Sourced LAAA team rent comp report — 8734-8736 Burnet Ave Rent Comps.html, May 2026. Market context: RentCafe, ApartmentList. All comps independently verified against active listings on Apartments.com, Zillow, and CoStar.
These items drive the spread between the cases — and the first one is the master variable.
The LA County Assessor records all 20 units as separate "Condominium" parcels (APNs 2654-007-167 to -186), so a condominium subdivision is on record — this points to a reactivation, not a ground-up conversion. The remaining work is reviving the dormant 8734 Burnet HOA and confirming the CC&Rs are current. The preliminary title report should still confirm the recorded condo plan and a clean path; full-conversion cost and timing (Tentative Tract Map, ~12-24 month entitlement, the ≥5% area-vacancy gate under LAMC 12.95.2) are retained only as the downside case.
The counter makes the buyer responsible for the work in the City's Report (9A) after closing. The model carries a $150K placeholder. The actual scope must be obtained and priced in the 12-day contingency window — it could be materially higher.
15 of the 20 units are occupied (5 vacant). Delivering units for individual sale requires tenant turnover with proper notice and relocation assistance. The 1990 build is non-RSO, which eases this, but LA's non-RSO relocation rules still apply — verify amounts and tenant categories with counsel against the rent roll.
Valley Villas is delivering 75 new-construction condos in the same ZIP. Selling 20 units into that competition may require price concessions or a longer sell-through — both modeled via the exit-value and timeline inputs.
PSA fully executed; 12 calendar days from acceptance to remove contingencies, with the 3% deposit ($123,000) at risk after that. Title work and the 9A scope must be priced and confirmed inside that window. DD package was delivered on May 21, 2026 — rent roll, P&Ls, leases, taxes, and insurance are in hand and validate the rental thesis.
Execution priorities for the condominium sell-out — sequenced from the contingency window through unit closings: